I've been on a bit of a role getting some conversations going here, it's cool!
Five days ago I started a thread about Luke Cage and The Wrecker, and whether or not their battle in New Avengers was accurate in the general sense. For those wondering, we determined 11-8 that Cage should've beaten the Wrecker, so it was pretty close!
Prior to that there was a Luke Cage/Thing thread which really got all the versus talk back up and running. I love waxing these things, and I know they're generally perceived as cheesy thread ideas, but to me it's enjoying comcis!
It's about the characters we love, stories we enjoy, and just a good bit of fun. It's the sports bar debate of comics!
Thing versus Namor was touched on
briefly before the Thing/Cage thread died out, and even though King of Mars made a thread today, I still wanted to get into this one.
Thing is obviously one of the most respected guys in Marvel, and we were able to really establish the fact that he's one of the biggest hearts too.
He's a major powerhouse fighter, but then again, so is the Sub-Mariner.
Namor has a twist of versatility, and a completely DIFFERENT motivation and way of having a lot of heart in a fight.
So, talk to me folks. Who should win a fight?
(
Again, sorry King of Mars, but I had my heart on trying this thread after the Cage/Wrecker one - [link] 
)