Spider-Nipples

tjtolosa · 07-29-2005, 10:23 AM

OK... anybody remember the whole Shanna fiasco with Marvel a while back where they went back and edited all the nipples out of the comics? Well, check out the cover to Giant Size Spider-Woman . Click on the thumbnail for the larger pc and you can ery clearly see a nipple pokin' out on SG's left breast. Now, I don't personally have a problem with this, but how is it that it's ok in this instance and not in the other?

nihilance · 07-29-2005, 10:29 AM

Because it wasn't poking nipples but actual areola that was visible in Shanna.

tjtolosa · 07-29-2005, 10:33 AM

Ohhhhh... I guess that is a little different... different degrees of the same thing as far as I'm concerned... I always wondered how it was that none of the superheroines in comics never got cold anyway...

nihilance · 07-29-2005, 10:34 AM

Yeah...Shanna has (had) full blown nudity in it...quite a difference than Spiderwoman who's entire body is covered except the bottom of her face.

Amos Moses · 07-29-2005, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nihilance

Yeah...Shanna has (had) full blown nudity in it...quite a difference than Spiderwoman who's entire body is covered except the bottom of her face.

Some lonly loser will probably start begging for pics.

Pics?

who cares? · 07-29-2005, 11:27 AM

nipples are always good..... it's sad seeing just plain breasts.... although that's not bad either.......

SeanC · 07-29-2005, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who cares?

nipples are always good..... it's sad seeing just plain breasts.... although that's not bad either.......

It has always killed me that a breast isn't considered "nude" unless the nipple is showing. So, you could have the ENTIRE breast out there, poking you in the face, but as long as there is a nickel covering the nipple? Not naked.