BENDIS! Tweets

Tweets are Loading...

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: If it had been Harry and not Norman who did Gwen, would that be better?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,352

    If it had been Harry and not Norman who did Gwen, would that be better?

    I think that would have been OK. Not great, but not....as bad

  2. #2
    The Effing President TheTravis!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    31,165

    Re: If it had been Harry and not Norman who did Gwen, would that be better?

    Yes. That would have made some sort of sense.
    Quote Originally Posted by BENDIS! View Post
    the travis is a sweety.

  3. #3
    The OTHER Summers Brother Adrian B AWESOME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Plookopolis
    Posts
    52,347

    Re: If it had been Harry and not Norman who did Gwen, would that be better?

    I would've it rather it been Adrian Toomes than fucking Norman Osborne.

    ANYTHING makes more sense that NO.

    Hell, Aunt May makes more sense.
    Quote Originally Posted by joepineapples View Post
    Why include a review from Wired? That rag has turned into a government, military-industrial propaganda machine.

  4. #4
    Made Ryan F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    St Paul, MN
    Posts
    9,104

    Re: If it had been Harry and not Norman who did Gwen, would that be better?

    Agreed.

  5. #5

    Re: If it had been Harry and not Norman who did Gwen, would that be better?

    I don't know if it would have been "better" but it certainly would have been more believable. Shit, if creepy old guys with bad hair could really get that sort of hot, teenaged tail, I'd be camped out at the local high school.

    /kidding
    //really, I am


  6. #6

    Re: If it had been Harry and not Norman who did Gwen, would that be better?

    Hmmm that could actually have worked and still made some sense.

    The goofy ninja twins would still suck though.

  7. #7
    The Effing President TheTravis!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    31,165

    Re: If it had been Harry and not Norman who did Gwen, would that be better?

    You know what would have been better? If they were Peter's kids. THAT would have been better.
    Quote Originally Posted by BENDIS! View Post
    the travis is a sweety.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,352

    Re: If it had been Harry and not Norman who did Gwen, would that be better?

    it would have made SOME sense though. best friend sleeping with best friend's girl happens a lot and would have still made it painful for peter. norman would still have incentive to have aged them...

    funny they didn't think this would have worked after the "they're peter's kids" thing was 86'ed

  9. #9

    Re: If it had been Harry and not Norman who did Gwen, would that be better?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheTravis!
    You know what would have been better? If they were Peter's kids. THAT would have been better.
    I respectfully disagree

    Let's face it Hyper-Aged fucking Ninja Kids suck no matter who their daddy was.

  10. #10
    Made Freeway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    7,360

    Re: If it had been Harry and not Norman who did Gwen, would that be better?

    Donald Trump gets insane young ass.
    DONALD TRUMP.

    Norman Osborn = Donald Trump + Evil Industrialist
    FREE HUGS.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •