
Originally Posted by
WinstonWolf
But I'm really wondering. I'm not knocking Millar. Like I said, he seems like a cool guy (although I'm not sure I would really want to hang out with him on a regular basis if he's usually as drunk or plastered as I hear him say he usually is.) I'm sure I would enjoy speaking to him very much. But I just dont see why people go all ga ga over his writing. His MK Spider-Man, it just had to many out of character moments and stupid behavior. It was painful to read at times, it was like one of those movies you watch where you just want to smack the characters on screen for being so dam stupid. I could see if people consider his comics to be entertaining, but that's just about it. But when I hear people list him as one of the great comic writers, or one of the greatest, or along with Moore, or Gaiman, etc, it's just, well, it boggles this mind. Dan Slott is a very entertaining writer (IMO, and many other opinions I hear\read.), but he knows how to write entertaining and fun (an element that seems to be very scarce at the big two these days.) comics without resorting to unnecessary\inappropriate sex\sexual dialogue, fart jokes, etc. It's not exactly the kind of writing that you expect from a comic book professional.
Bookmarks