
Originally Posted by
Morrison_Lad
Question: How do you know if the hope you are engaging in is false while you are engaging in it?
Answer: You don't.
Hope is passive. It's better to aspire to things, as opposed to hope for things. You're life sucks? Aspire to make it better. Make a list of things that need to change and improve. Do one little thing each day off of the list. After some period of time, look back and see if things are better. Are they? If so, good. If not, make another list. Or choose another route.
But having hope that things will get better? I mean, I can sit around here and hope that a supermodel will fall in love with me, I suppose. It's never going to happen, though, so why expend the energy and set myself up for defeat in the end?
It's like the lottery. I am a supporter of the lottery because, at least in my state, it is very important to our education funding (which is a really, really sad fact in it's own right, but that's a different thread). But in reality? You have a better chance of being hit by lighting -- twice -- in the same day -- than of winning the lottery.
Hope is passive. That's the bottom line. In the end, having hope is only setting yourself up for even deeper problems down the road.
Aspiration, at least, is active.
ETA: I will say this, though: despite my feelings on the subject, I've always thought that "Hope" was one of the most beautiful names.
Bookmarks