I understand what you're saying, and scientifically you're absolutely right, but at that same time I kind of hate having things reduced to those terms. How can one really enjoy emotions if they overanalyze them to just simple physical processes. How can one love someone if they can just go, "there's no such thing is love, it's all just a chemical reaction no different than mixing vinegar with baking soda." Or how can they enjoy happiness when in the back of their mind they're going, "there's no such thing as happiness, it's just my brain being flooded with endorphines."
My Mind's EyeOriginally Posted by Shel Silverstein
Well, that explains why you're always in the moods you're in. You're carrying too much existential angst, man. Sometimes you just gotta turn the brain off and just roll with things.
My Mind's EyeOriginally Posted by Shel Silverstein
My Mind's EyeOriginally Posted by Shel Silverstein
I'm sure they have their own research going, we just don't hear about it cause the idea is widely scoffed at. See the problem is that I think their is a certain train of logic here that says that if you validate life after death your validating religion, given that death and what comes after has been the cornerstone of any religion. This isn't to say that any religion out there is necessarily right about the subject. But religion has given us a explanation where science has failed to.
Bookmarks