That is a disposable computer in my opinion. If you want a computer that lasts you 2+ years of solid performance, you spend the money it takes to produce something like that. I am not saying that $400 is nothing. I am saying that was not enough to get a quality product. Any laptop I buy is going to cost $800 or more, becuase I need a minimum quality in build, and need the technolgy to be ahead of the curve enough that it will not be obsolete before I am ready to buy a new one.
Look at the average price of a tablet. $400+, and those are something less than what a true PC can do.
Yay! Posting from my Kindle Fire!
I think you two should resolve your issues via greco-roman style wrestling. With the winner holding down the loser and penetrating him while he cries.
Apple wins injunction against Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57...laxy-tab-10.1/
HOME | Facebook | Twitter | Tumblr | LinkedIn | Change.org | Formspring | T2
BENDIS there's a man who knows a thing or two about a thing or two!
AlexMaleev I love your posts
Jason California HOOKS said it. That is really all you need for confiramtion.
ShadowlinePimp God bless you HOOKS. I hope you bang the hell out of some really hot chick today.
jason hissong Our currency should be altered to read IN HOOKS WE TRUST.
Nexus 7 tablet pictured ahead of I/O?
The folks over at Gizmodo Australia were sent a training document reportedly being sent around to third-party retailers ahead of the Nexus 7 launch. Of course, we recognize that this may indeed be fake, but a leak this close to the unveil leads us to believe it very well may prove true.
Aw for fucks sake...
I don't see how you can make a realistic, functional tablet not look similar to an iPad. The only way Samsung could do it is make it bulkier and awkwardly shaped, and thus no one would buy it. It's ridiculous.In an order on Tuesday granting the preliminary injunction, Judge Lucy H. Koh of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division has enjoined Samsung and its U.S. subsidiaries from importing or selling within the U.S. the tablet or any "product that is no more than colorably different from this specified product and embodies any design contained in U.S. Design Patent No. D504,889."
The patent refers to the ornamental design of the device. The court previously found the Galaxy Tab 10.1 to be substantially similar "in the eyes of the ordinary observer" to the D'889, the Judge said. It noted that the Galaxy Tab 10.1 is "virtually indistinguishable" from Apple's iPad and iPad 2, she added.
Sites that may or may not interest you..
Bookmarks