I have never played Bioshock...

[Fygar]

Nah, it's cool. Honestly, it's a much better pick than most would make so I'm not like, flabbergasted. If you said Halo 3, we couldn't converse anymore. It's just kind of a Fallout 3 syndrome to me because of the gameplay itself being mediocre while everything else is amazing (though I'd actually put Fallout as probably my 2nd game of this generation and of past year too so far). Number one? Let's just say... SNAKE? SNAKE?!! SNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE!!!!!

No...I actually think Halo 3 might be my least favorite game of this generation thus far. It's so incredibly mediocre in all areas except for matchmaking that I can't believe it's a phenomenon (that is the first time in my life I spelled phenomenon correctly on the first try). I just got my copy of Fallout 3 today, but I probably won't start it for awhile (Dead Space and Valkyria Chronicles still sitting on the backlog). I have a feeling it's going to be one of those top five games for me. I liked MGS 4, but didn't love it. For whatever reason I only seem to really love the odd numbered MGS titles. Both 2 and 4 are good but the boss battles/ story didn't blow me away like the original and Snake Eater did.

[Armored Dildo]

I thought it needed a multiplayer mode. I traded it in after finishing it

PS3 version does.

[costello]

I have a PS3, so graphics cards and such mean nothing to me.

By the way, the reason I ask is that I saw the game pretty cheap (for next gen games anyway) and was considering a purchase.

Hey, me too.

[Mike_Johnson]

Beat the game and loved it.

I'm now trying to make my way through on Survivor without using Vita-Chambers. It's just as hard as it sounds.

[PatrickA]

It is worth it for the Fort frolic level alone.

In most FPS games you put up with the story to get to the shooting. In Bioshock, the opposite it true. I don't mean that the combat is bad, because it isn't. It's just not the most important part.