Reply With QuoteNo.Originally Posted by smm EBob
ok this is a completly theoretical question to be taken with a grain of salt.
do you feel that moving the X-Men to San Francisco is perpetuating the mutant/homosexual analogy?
No.
It means they're still repairing the Golden Gate Bridge after X-Men 3.
The X-Men are tired of living in the same area full of the same people that always hate them and tired of rebuilding that same damn mansion... I would move too
I think it's perpetuating the mutant/Chinese analogy.
Brubaker did comment that the San Francisco choice did have something to do with them being more "open" to different types of people there.
"When the snows fall and the white winds blow, the lone wolf dies, but the pack survives."
I think Matt Fraction is building up to a X-MEN/FULL HOUSE crossover.
That makes a lot of sence.
*edit* Though maybe Portland would've been a better choice.
Last edited by Akira; 06-23-2008 at 12:14 PM.
No, because despite what Fox News shows America, San Francisco is not solely a foam night at a gay dance club.
It's a diverse city with populations of all stripes.
Basing the X-Men in SF is no different than basing them in Manhattan, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, Minneapolis or any large major city.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks