Should have made this a public vote.
More schmucky Hillaryness is what it is.
Fuck yeah it should!
Hell no. It was agreed upon at the beginning of the Primaries.
Just wondering what everyone thinks.
I can't vote in the poll. The votes as they stand should not count. Especially in Michigan, where Hilldog ran unopposed. A revote, however, is the best thing for all concerned.
Join the Prime-Punch revolution!
http://www.606studios.com/bendisboar...ead.php?210786
Spoiler:
Buy The Gathering!
www.grayhavencomics.com
Hell no. Everyone who voted in those states should be raising hell with their state reps too. Their state committees screwed over their own voters.
This is especially true in Michigan where the choices in the democratic primary were Hillary Clinton and "uncommitted".
I'm not a doctor, but I play one on the internet.
'If You Don't Know Where You're Going, Any Road Will Get You There." --The Cheshire Cat
Be hold the Glory of Hermit Crab in a Glass Shell
They need to redo the votes in both states. The only question is who pays for it. Part of me thinks the party should, but the states are the ones who chose to violate the rules. However, the taxpayers shouldn't be screwed twice over.
Either don't count them or have a revote. I would have no problem with either of those courses. To count the votes when there wasn't equal candidate participation would just seem like more Big Democrat Machine shenanigans coronating the Big Machine candidate. That won't go over well.
If they counted the two as is, the party would splinter and be irrepairable for the general election. They need a revote. That's the only way to fix it.
Originally Posted by masculine todd
Bookmarks