Yeah...hello, what the hell do you think was going to happpen why you elected BUSH
Political Web Sites to be Censored by U.S. Government?
by James W. Harris
Online political censorship in the U.SA.?
It may be on the way -- and soon.
Bradley Smith is a member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC). He’s also a strong believer in the importance of vigorous online political speech.
And right now, he’s worried.
In an interview with CNET News.com, Smith warns that the 2002 McCain-Feingold campaign finance restrictions may soon be applied to the Internet, thanks to a recent ruling by a federal judge that any coordinated political activity over the Internet must be regulated.
This new decision essentially overturned the FEC's vote in 2002 to exempt most Internet communications from the notoriously restrictive McCain-Feingold campaign finance law.
The results could be devastating for online free speech. Some examples:
* Blogs and other Web sites -- even personal home pages -- could be fined by the federal government for merely linking to a candidate’s Web site.
* Forwarding a political candidate's press release to a mailing list, or extensively quoting a candidate’s literature via email, could be a crime.
* Blogs might be faced with having to hire a lawyer to approve their political commentary and linking, or just stop speaking out on political issues.
It sounds unbelievable. Yet, says Smith: “We're talking about any decision by an individual to put a link [to a political candidate] on their home page, set up a blog, send out mass emails, any kind of activity that can be done on the Internet.
“The impact would affect email lists, especially if there's any sense that they're done in coordination with the campaign. If I forward something from the campaign to my personal list of several hundred people, which is a great grassroots activity, that's what we're talking about...“
The McCain-Feingold law does have a press exemption. But that won’t necessarily protect bloggers and online journals, Smith said, because "the statute refers to periodicals or broadcast, and it's not clear the Internet is either of those.”
Indeed, CNET News.com notes that federal law limits the press exemption to a "broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine or other periodical publication."
Smith fears this has the potential to wipe out the blogging revolution that has so dramatically affected journalism and politics in the past few years. Fundamental online grassroots political activism could obviously be squelched as well.
Smith further says: “Senators McCain and Feingold have argued that we have to regulate the Internet, that we have to regulate email. They sued us in court over this and they won.
“It's going to be a battle,” Smith says, adding that if Congress doesn’t demand freedom for online political speech and activism, “then I think grassroots Internet activity is in danger.”
(Source: CNET News.com:
http://news.com.com/The+coming+crack...ml?tag=st.prev
World Net Daily:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=43140 )
Yeah...hello, what the hell do you think was going to happpen why you elected BUSH
I used to like the McCain/Feingold reforms. But fuck this shit.
Originally Posted by BWC Boston
Yeah. You may be on to something, there.
actually I'm pretty sure this has already been shot down. The FEC has clarified the position. I'll try and find where I saw that.
And suddenly, the population of user-owned servers in Canada skyrockets.
Oh, that's right, Bush just got
Dammit I know I saw a story where the FEC clarified saying they weren't going to go after speech at all, that anything they did would only deal with money.
I just can't find it now
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks