Miller's films had Miller as an active participant. I don't see Moore doing that with adaptations of his comics.
After Sin city and 300 you think they can make a better Alan Moore movie?
I enjoyed V for vendetta but League wasn't what it could of been...After the success of 300 you think Alan Moore might soften his stance on adaptation of his work into movies?Do you think Watchmen can be as successful as a 300?
Don't do it Ninja... Don't!!!!
Don't waste all of your energy on stealth you still need to penetrate the chest plates.
Xbox tag BronxRonin
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...endid=48568684
http://web.mac.com/bronxronin1/iWeb/...20Cricket.html
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17l7...f/original.gif
Miller's films had Miller as an active participant. I don't see Moore doing that with adaptations of his comics.
No. Miller movies are easier to adapt than Moore movies.
Miller stories are built for films, Moore's aren't.
I want to see a visionary director Uwe Boll bring one of Rob Liefield's books to the screen.
Moore will always wear cranky pants high atop his mighty steed.
What is the reason Moore has given regarding his stance on movie adaptations? I'm just curious.
Bookmarks