PDA

View Full Version : Cure For Caner Predicted To Be Found In 2015 By WHO..



Cth
04-06-2005, 08:25 AM
http://www.rednova.com/news/health/141544/mankind_will_beat_cancer_by_2015_says_who_scientis t/index.html

Mankind Will Beat Cancer By 2015, Says WHO Scientist

A GOLDEN age of cancer treatment which should finally overcome the killer disease is just a decade away, according to leading experts in the field.

Scientists believe current research will lead to new drugs that will turn cancer from a fatal condition into one which people can live with for most of their lives.

Professor Karol Sikora, a special advisor to the World Health Organisation, said: "At the moment, most people will die from it once the disease spreads. That will stop in about 2015. [Cancers] will become controllable illnesses - you will still have cancer, but you'll live with it for a long time, rather like diabetes."

The disease will still need constant treatment, but new treatments will give sufferers a much better quality of life - similar to the way diabetics live now - and avoid the need for harsh alternatives such as chemotherapy.

Prof Sikora, who is an internationally respected cancer doctor based in London's Harley Street, is among several experts taking part in a public meeting tomorrow as part of Edinburgh International Science Festival at the Royal College of Physicians.

He said: "The golden age of drug discovery is not far away with targeted treatments to suit an individual patient's needs and tailored therapies to ensure cancers are controlled and pain-free - long term control of cancer within ten years for the majority of cancers.

"New treatments will stop the cancers growing and they will essentially grow dormant.

"I am confident that living with cancer will be more dignified in the future. It will be much better than being on chemotherapy, which is quite unpleasant."

In addition to new drugs, genetic therapy and lifestyle changes would be used to minimise the effect of cancer, which is caused when damaged cells - by a variety of causes including smoking and sunlight - stop dying off naturally and reproduce uncontrollably.

However, Prof Sikora said such treatments were likely to be very expensive - as much as GBP 100,000 a year to treat one patient. "That's worrying for health budgets all over the world," he said.

He added that cancer vaccines were another area of development which could result in far cheaper forms of treatment and prevention.

However, Prof Sikora said it would take time for scientists to gradually develop effective treatments for each of the roughly 200 forms of cancer.

Last month, scientists at the Marie Curie Research Institute in Oxford - funded by the St Andrews-based charity the Association for International Cancer Research (AICR) - announced they had managed to put skin cancer cells into a "coma", stopping them from multiplying and developing into life-threatening tumours.

This is believed to be the first time anyone in the world has managed to switch off the basic mechanism of cancer, which causes the infected cells to grow uncontrollably into tumours.

Derek Napier, chief executive of AICR, which is co-hosting tomorrow's public meeting with Edinburgh Drug Absorption Foundation, said this was a potential step towards the "holy grail" of a general cure for cancer which would work for all forms of the disease, rather than just one type.

The next stage would be to persuade the cancerous cells to die off by restarting the natural process of "cell suicide".

SolidGoldBomb
04-06-2005, 09:39 AM
This isn't a cure, there's no money in a cure. There is plenty of money in lifetime prescriptions however.

yeamon
04-06-2005, 09:42 AM
Who?

Ben
04-06-2005, 09:42 AM
This isn't a cure, there's no money in a cure. There is plenty of money in lifetime prescriptions however.
I disagree. No one's getting rich off of chemotherapy, and rich people get cancer just as often as poor people.

RebootedCorpse
04-06-2005, 09:45 AM
..just...gotta...hold...out...

SolidGoldBomb
04-06-2005, 09:47 AM
I disagree. No one's getting rich off of chemotherapy, and rich people get cancer just as often as poor people.

Huh? What does that have to do with what I said.

AAlgar
04-06-2005, 09:48 AM
Caner has claimed too many vitims. It's about time.

xyzzy
04-06-2005, 09:48 AM
This isn't a cure, there's no money in a cure. There is plenty of money in lifetime prescriptions however.

The real money is in non-life saving drugs like Viagra. You don't have to worry about pressure from governments and whiney dying people about your prices, then.

Corey A.
04-06-2005, 09:49 AM
This isn't a cure, there's no money in a cure. There is plenty of money in lifetime prescriptions however.

I totally belive this statement. They will find a way for you to live with it, not cure it. They can't even cure the common cold yet.

Dreg
04-06-2005, 09:52 AM
Professor Karol Sikora

I don't remember him being in Who. He's probably another obsessed fan who heard Teenage Wasteland and assumed that it was written about him.

SteveZegers
04-06-2005, 09:53 AM
Yah! I'm gonna start smokin!

NATE!
04-06-2005, 09:53 AM
The real money is in non-life saving drugs like Viagra. You don't have to worry about pressure from governments and whiney dying people about your prices, then.

http://www.emusing.com/imgs/page_imgs/images/doctor_patient_03.gif

Bill!
04-06-2005, 09:53 AM
This isn't a cure, there's no money in a cure. There is plenty of money in lifetime prescriptions however.

Thank you Chris Rock.

Gregory
04-06-2005, 09:54 AM
If Bartlett had listened to Sam Seaborn, it coulda been gone by 2011.

Ben
04-06-2005, 09:54 AM
Huh? What does that have to do with what I said.
IF what you said is true, people who already be making tons of money off of the current "lifetime perscription" which is, essentially, what chemotherapy and radiation treatment is.

Most people who get cancer, eventually die of cancer.

Bill!
04-06-2005, 09:54 AM
I totally belive this statement. They will find a way for you to live with it, not cure it. They can't even cure the common cold yet.

I know, isn't that ridiculous? They can land a man on the moon but my car can't get 150,000 miles a gallon. It's sickening.

Twocool4u1
04-06-2005, 09:56 AM
i just bought this

http://www.shirtsforacure.com/samples/5/front.gif

http://www.shirtsforacure.com/

Artie Pink
04-06-2005, 09:56 AM
Is this the same Professor Karol Sikora who's president of the Peter Jennings Fan Club?

AAlgar
04-06-2005, 09:58 AM
IF what you said is true, people who already be making tons of money off of the current "lifetime perscription" which is, essentially, what chemotherapy and radiation treatment is.

Most people who get cancer, eventually die of cancer.

I thought we were talking about caner.

SolidGoldBomb
04-06-2005, 10:02 AM
IF what you said is true, people who already be making tons of money off of the current "lifetime perscription" which is, essentially, what chemotherapy and radiation treatment is.

Most people who get cancer, eventually die of cancer.

Chemotherapy and radiation treatments cost thousands of dollars as well as taking a long time for employees and patients. That ends up costing insurance more to cover it, and cost the hospitals extra to administer it. Its much more profitable to mass produce a pill that you can make for pennies and sell for hundreds.

And yes thank Chris Rock, I would have quoted that bit he did but I forgot how it went.

xyzzy
04-06-2005, 10:09 AM
Chemotherapy and radiation treatments cost thousands of dollars as well as taking a long time for employees and patients. That ends up costing insurance more to cover it, and cost the hospitals extra to administer it. Its much more profitable to mass produce a pill that you can make for pennies and sell for hundreds.

And yes thank Chris Rock, I would have quoted that bit he did but I forgot how it went.

If someone can make a pill that will replace chemo and radiation therapy with no major side affects, it'd be worth it. Why begrudge them profit?

Corey A.
04-06-2005, 10:15 AM
I just have a feeling in 50+ years the medical community will look back at how barbaric out current cancer treatments are. My mother had breast cancer 5 years ago. (Thank God she's in remission) I had to drive her to the hospital every week. It's the worst thing I've ever witnessed in my life. To see a family member get radiation tretments. It's almost like they kill your entire body just to get the cancer.

Alex K.
04-06-2005, 10:57 AM
If Bartlett had listened to Sam Seaborn, it coulda been gone by 2011.

Also my first thought :p

Fourthman
04-06-2005, 11:13 AM
The Daleks will just come up with something else.

SolidGoldBomb
04-06-2005, 11:21 AM
If someone can make a pill that will replace chemo and radiation therapy with no major side affects, it'd be worth it. Why begrudge them profit?

Because they COULD just cure it for real. No more cancer, period.

Instead of spending $200 a month (or whatever) for your prescription, let's say that for a cost of $10,000 they could cure you of cancer.
If you paid 200 a month for an avg of say, 50 years, thats $120,000.
So if you were a president of Pfizer would you rather make 10gs or 120gs?

Taki Soma
04-06-2005, 11:22 AM
what's a caner?

Artie Pink
04-06-2005, 11:39 AM
what's a caner?

Caner? I barely know her!