This needs no title [Archive]

tdaniel

08-18-2009, 11:19 PM

Is Spidey just throwing the horns, or is he out of web fluid, or what? Shouldn't webs shoot out when he does that?

horns. if she was backed up on you like that, it would be horns.

RegHorsten

08-18-2009, 11:24 PM

horns. if she was backed up on you like that, it would be horns.

:rofl:

AmirLehman

08-18-2009, 11:33 PM

Is Spidey just throwing the horns, or is he out of web fluid, or what? Shouldn't webs shoot out when he does that?

I read somewhere that he has to tap twice to shoot webs. That's why when he makes a fist webs don't shoot out. I don't know if that applies to his organic shooters though.

Kedd

08-19-2009, 12:09 AM

I read somewhere that he has to tap twice to shoot webs. That's why when he makes a fist webs don't shoot out. I don't know if that applies to his organic shooters though.

What organic shooters...

ernster

08-19-2009, 12:20 AM

panco

08-19-2009, 12:48 AM

This cover is fantastic. The coloring and inking give it some kind of cell shading/cartoon rendering that I find amazing.
The inking on Spiderwoman's left arm is reddish for example instead of black.

If this kind of stuff is the overall direction Immonen is heading to for his NA, I expect fantastic stuff coming our way!

danlomb

08-19-2009, 01:17 AM

Two suns?

The Spiders go to Tatooine?

DAVE

08-19-2009, 04:52 AM

assuming that split in his chest is his pectoral muscles, did parker wash the spider out of his costume?

edit to add: yeah, no more organic webs after quesada gave the finger to anything he didn't like about the last 20 years.

From the perspective that we're looking up at the picture, the spider symbol is over "the split" in his pectoral muscles, away from the viewer.

And "quesada gave the finger to anything he didn't like about the last 20 years"? Give me a break. :roll:

panco

08-19-2009, 04:58 AM

And "quesada gave the finger to anything he didn't like about the last 20 years"? Give me a break. :roll:

I don't think he wanted to give the finger to anything yet here's the man quoted from his cup of joe column :

what I’ve said in the past was that there were three genies that I wanted to get back in the bottle.

Cut down the number of mutants so that they became special again. See “House of M.”
Make the Marvel Universe as unpredictable a place as it was in the early 1960s. See “Civil War.”
Bring Peter Parker back to single status. See “One More Day.”

So, no hints necessary, so far all missions accomplished and it only took me close to ten years.
I’m so tired.

Link's here (http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=22557).

Alex(sadly)Maleev

08-19-2009, 04:59 AM

Ahem, belly button.

panco

08-19-2009, 05:00 AM

Ahem, belly button.

Yeah that's kinda your trademark ! Royalties damnit ;-).

DAVE

08-19-2009, 05:02 AM

I don't think he wanted to give the finger to anything yet here's the man quoted from his cup of joe column :

Link's here (http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=22557).

Yeah, okay?

panco

08-19-2009, 05:25 AM

Yeah, okay?

Just saying, to some it may appear as the man got rid of what he did'nt like on a personnal level. Hence the use of expressions such as "gave the finger" etc...

Imo he mostly did it to bring more in terms of character developpement and that's what happened.
I not debatting at all , I'm a JoeQ fan.
Sorry I made this thread slightly derail back to Immonen grandeur now :-) !

Cth

08-19-2009, 05:32 AM

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2088/2881/320/RequiemForaDream_9.jpg to http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2088/2881/320/RequiemForaDream_9.jpg

DAVE

08-19-2009, 05:45 AM

Just saying, to some it may appear as the man got rid of what he did'nt like on a personnal level. Hence the use of expressions such as "gave the finger" etc...

Imo he mostly did it to bring more in terms of character developpement and that's what happened.
I not debatting at all , I'm a JoeQ fan.
Sorry I made this thread slightly derail back to Immonen grandeur now :-) !

That's a lot for someone to read into "Bring Peter Parker back to single status." I understand that you're not debating, and I don't really mean to get on you, but if you don't agree with the poster's remark why are you explaining/clarifying it?

James W

08-19-2009, 05:48 AM

Is Spidey just throwing the horns, or is he out of web fluid, or what? Shouldn't webs shoot out when he does that?
There's a button on the lower part of his palm. He can put his fingers there without pressing it.

Superior Kiai

08-19-2009, 05:51 AM

horns. if she was backed up on you like that, it would be horns.

"And once again, here I am, surrounded by a bunch of B and C level villains who I'm now supposed to be very afraid of, and my only help is little miss 'I don't care for copyright infringement' right heeeee... OH, MY GOD??? Is that her ass I feel on my hip??? Forget what I said!! I'd rather have her watch my back than the smelly Canadian midget any day! Lord, those are some smooth cheeks.... "

Brian Defferding

08-19-2009, 06:22 AM

They are rubbing their buttcheeks on each other, aren't they?

Matt Jay

08-19-2009, 06:27 AM

Immonen never fails to amaze.

I hope the whole issue looks like that.

ernster

08-19-2009, 09:53 AM

That's a lot for someone to read into "Bring Peter Parker back to single status." I understand that you're not debating, and I don't really mean to get on you, but if you don't agree with the poster's remark why are you explaining/clarifying it?

my remark about "giving the finger to the last 20 years" is a opinion shared by many a spiderfan at the comicshop, including the owners. they used much stronger language to describe erasing peter's marriage as well as retconning many events (like harry's death) to "bring peter parker back to single status."

you don't have to agree with me, but can you admit that many a longtime fan were dismayed at how one more day proceeded as if many stories since 1987 never occurred?

i voted my objection by cancelling my subscription, and i'm not alone.

Gregory

08-19-2009, 09:55 AM

Immonen never fails.

DAVE

08-19-2009, 09:56 AM

my remark about "giving the finger to the last 20 years" is a opinion shared by many a spiderfan at the comicshop, including the owners. they used much stronger language to describe erasing peter's marriage as well as retconning many events (like harry's death) to "bring peter parker back to single status."

you don't have to agree with me, but can you admit that many a longtime fan were dismayed at how one more day proceeded as if many stories since 1987 never occurred?

i voted my objection by cancelling my subscription, and i'm not alone.

Well, you and the many a spiderfan at the comicshop (including the owners), keep on fighting the good fight!

ernster

08-19-2009, 10:03 AM

Well, you and the many a spiderfan at the comicshop (including the owners), keep on fighting the good fight!

let me ask you this: do you think that the drop in readership resulted in the reversal of ben reilly as "one true spider-man" or did editorial simply decide that was the wrong way to take the character?

is there a better way to show disapproval than to stop reading the book? surely a message board post is not going to affect sales or change canon.

do you think publishers are more concerned with getting younger readers than keeping the older ones who grew up reading comics and still do?

edwardmblake

08-19-2009, 10:03 AM

Two suns?

The Spiders go to Tatooine?

They were hoping to go Tashi Station to pick up some power converters. But they'll have time to waste with their friends later.

Kedd

08-19-2009, 10:06 AM

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2088/2881/320/RequiemForaDream_9.jpg to http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2088/2881/320/RequiemForaDream_9.jpg

I see what you did there. Pretty clever, Cth.

Jef UK

08-19-2009, 10:32 AM

let me ask you this: do you think that the drop in readership resulted in the reversal of ben reilly as "one true spider-man" or did editorial simply decide that was the wrong way to take the character?

is there a better way to show disapproval than to stop reading the book? surely a message board post is not going to affect sales or change canon.

do you think publishers are more concerned with getting younger readers than keeping the older ones who grew up reading comics and still do?

I think Marvel is happy with Spidey sales and you stopped reading a book that became the best it's been in decades because of said changes.

TheTravis!

08-19-2009, 11:00 AM

They are rubbing their buttcheeks on each other, aren't they?

Butt hug.

TheTravis!

08-19-2009, 11:01 AM

I think Marvel is happy with Spidey sales and you stopped reading a book that became the best it's been in decades because of said changes.

And there's nothing wrong with that.

Gordon Chumway

08-19-2009, 11:11 AM

I think Marvel is happy with Spidey sales and you stopped reading a book that became the best it's been in decades because of said changes.

I'm not bad mouthing what is going on now, but JMS and JRJR had an amazing run. Some of my favorite stories ever.

adam_warlock_2099

08-19-2009, 11:33 AM

"And once again, here I am, surrounded by a bunch of B and C level villains who I'm now supposed to be very afraid of, and my only help is little miss 'I don't care for copyright infringement' right heeeee... OH, MY GOD??? Is that her ass I feel on my hip??? Forget what I said!! I'd rather have her watch my back than the smelly Canadian midget any day! Lord, those are some smooth cheeks.... "

Now he can shoot some web fluid.

Drkemerld73

08-19-2009, 11:40 AM

They are rubbing their buttcheeks on each other, aren't they?

Coming next Summer:

New Avengers: Requiem for a Spider

Where "Ass to ass!" get's a whole new meaning!

:)

Jason Baur

08-19-2009, 11:44 AM

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2088/2881/320/RequiemForaDream_9.jpg to http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2088/2881/320/RequiemForaDream_9.jpg

....Wait, what?

Seriously, I don't get it.

And are we still going on about the whole "OMD retconned tons of post-marriage stories out of existence" canard? That's simply not true. With the exception of the wedding itself, all the stories are still canon. Seriously, this is the "death panels" of OMD arguments, people.

woljed

08-19-2009, 12:07 PM

....Wait, what?

Seriously, I don't get it.

And are we still going on about the whole "OMD retconned tons of post-marriage stories out of existence" canard? That's simply not true. With the exception of the wedding itself, all the stories are still canon. Seriously, this is the "death panels" of OMD arguments, people.

I think that the stories should be enjoyed as they are and not to worry about past canon to show you what counts or not. Whatever you like is what you like from all the years.

Jef UK

08-19-2009, 01:26 PM

And there's nothing wrong with that.

What does this mean?

TheTravis!

08-19-2009, 04:11 PM

What does this mean?

That it's okay for people to not like things and bitch endlessly about them! That's why the internet was invented!

Garth

08-19-2009, 05:32 PM

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2088/2881/320/RequiemForaDream_9.jpg to http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2088/2881/320/RequiemForaDream_9.jpg

Is it wrong that I love that scene?

RebootedCorpse

08-19-2009, 05:35 PM

Butt buddies?

Superior Kiai

08-19-2009, 05:42 PM

Is it wrong that I love that scene?

Dunno. Is it wrong that I want an extended cut of that scene?

Garth

08-19-2009, 05:49 PM

Dunno. Is it wrong that I want an extended cut of that scene?

Shoot Aronofsky an e-mail! You know he has to have something archived--ya know, for when the going gets tough. Or if the whole Hollywood director thing didn't work out.