PDA

View Full Version : Box Office: 'Rush Hour 3' stalls, 'Bourne' still big, 'Stardust' bombs



JoeE
08-12-2007, 02:32 PM
http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/rush-hour-threequel-wont-top-sequel-bourne-still-delivering-big-ultimatum/


SUNDAY AM: New Line Cinema confirmed today that its Rush Hour threequel made only $50.2 million at the box office this weekend. Even using the studio's higher than rivals reported figures of $19.1 million Friday and $17.1 million Saturday from 3,778 theaters, the action buddy comedy clearly disappointed. The poorly reviewed movie, directed by Brett Ratner and starring Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker, couldn't do as well as Rush Hour 2, bourne13.jpgwhich in 2001 opened to $67.4 mil. Other problems for the troubled studio is that the film went wildly overbudget and set a new Hollywood salary high. Tucker earns $25 million against 20% of gross, and his deal comes with a second-picture commitment for the same salary on a film to be determined later. Chan gets around $15 million against 15% of gross, but he also owns the film's distribution rights in China and Hong Kong (but the Beijing government nixed the pic's distribution). Ratner gets a jump on the upfront part of the $5 million-against-5% gross deal he had on "Rush Hour 2." And screenwriter Jeff Nathanson is paid seven figures. How can the studio make money when it gives away 40% of the gross?

No doubt having another big action movie still atop the box office hurt RH3. Universal's holdover The Bourne Ultimatum was a strong No. 2, raking in $33.6 million ($10.4 mil Friday and $13.3 million Saturday) from 3,686 runs, according to the studio. That's down only 51% from a week ago, and its new cume is already $132.7 mil. Overseas, The Bourne Ultimatum just opened in 11 international territories and 350 locations and is 97% ahead of the original Bourne and 58% ahead of the second installment in the franchise after this weekend.

stardust3.jpgEnding its third weekend in release, 20th Century Fox's The Simpsons Movie hung in for #3, earning $3.5 mil Friday and $4.2 mil Saturday from 3,552 venues for a $11.1 mil weekend and new cume of $152.2 mil.

Which brings me to the No. 4 film, Paramount's Stardust, which totally tanked at its 2,540 venues this weekend, making only $8.6 mil despite decent reviews. (The studio claims it's $9 mil). But the romantic action fantasy starring Claire Danes, Robert DeNiro, Michelle Pfeiffer and Sienna Miller was a difficult movie to market (and the trailers were lousy). The only good news is that Paramount is on the hook for only 50% of the $70 mil budget, and the studio is counting on overseas numbers to be better thanks to an international cast.

The rest of the Top 10 had the air sucked out of their gross ticket receipts. New Line's Hairspray improved from Friday to Saturday for #5 with $6.5 mil this weekend from 2,805 dates and a new cume of $92.1 mil. At No. 6, Disney's bow-wow of a live action movie, Underdog, continues to disappoint, taking in just $6.4 mil this weekend (-44% compared to its opening) from 3,013 plays for a meager new cume of $24.7 mil. Universal's comedy I Now Pronounce You Chuck And Larry moved down to the 7th spot with $5.9 mil this weekend from 2,799 venues and a new cume of $103.8 mil. Finishing No. 8, Warner's Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix has slowed at the box office making only $5.4 mil this weekend from 2,585 theaters with a new cume of $272 million. This fivequel looks to finish either the second or third biggest domestically of the Harry Potter franchise.

daycamp256.jpgWarner's No Reservations starring Catherine Zeta-Jones eked out 9th place with $3.9 mil this weekend from 2,053 runs for a new cume of $32.1 mil. And, in the 10th spot, Sony / Revolution's sequel Daddy Day Camp with Cuba Gooding Jr., after a stillborn debut on Wednesday, earned $3.5 mil this weekend from 2,332 venues for a paltry new cume of $5 mil. But Sony sources remind that the pic was a direct-to-home entertainment title made for next to nothing. The pic only got a theatrical push after execs saw the film and thought it could do modest late summer biz. "To come out of weekend with almost as much as we put into it is solid, and the film will do just fine for the studio," an insider told me. (Uh, if you say so.)

Meanwhile, Miramax's holdover Becoming Jane finished just out of the Top 10 Friday with $2.8 mil this weekend from only 601 theaters for a new cume of $4.9 mil. But LGF/After Dark's Skinwalkers barely registered with just a $553K debut this weekend from 737 venues. Another newcomer, IDP/Goldwyn's 2 Days In Paris made $149K this weekend from just $8 mil but had the best per screen average of all the movies playing.

Ryan Elliott
08-12-2007, 02:34 PM
Rush Hour 3 was hilarious.

ZombieSpeedball
08-12-2007, 02:35 PM
Wow, I can't believe Stardust tanked. I liked it. Better than I liked Bourne Ultimatum.

JoeE
08-12-2007, 02:36 PM
Stardust had bomb written all over it from the first trailer. I'm surprised it didn't do worse, honestly.

Not passing judgment on the movie, BTW, I actually want to see it quite a bit.

Michael John Wheeler
08-12-2007, 02:44 PM
I saw Stardust for free and still felt ripped off. Aside from DeNiro's role, it was a horrible movie.

bartleby
08-12-2007, 02:44 PM
I'm surprised Paramount even greenlit STARDUST in the first place... although I really shouldn't be.

Ray G.
08-12-2007, 02:50 PM
Rush Hour actually did better than I expected. I mean, the sequel was about three years too late.

Dan McLellan
08-12-2007, 03:39 PM
Rush Hour made 50 million dollars? Sometimes I wonder...

The trailer was just a collection of racist jokes and bad action scenes.

Ben
08-12-2007, 03:45 PM
Rush Hour made 50 million dollars? Sometimes I wonder...

The trailer was just a collection of racist jokes and bad action scenes.So you're pre-judging the movie! Classic!

Dan McLellan
08-12-2007, 03:50 PM
I'll assume Ben added to the conversation instead of snidely making a joke.

Ben
08-12-2007, 03:50 PM
I'll assume Ben added to the conversation instead of snidely making a joke.Tickets cost too much! Theater floors are sticky!

Brian Boru
08-12-2007, 03:54 PM
Rush Hour 3 was hilarious.

Holy crap. Someone actually found it ENTERTAINING?

So, are you related to Chan or Tucker?

Captain Sensation
08-12-2007, 03:56 PM
Holy crap. Someone actually found it ENTERTAINING?

So, are you related to Chan or Tucker?

i enjoyed it also, and no, not related to either.

As for stardust, as someone who knows nothing about it. The commercials for it, werent appealing at all and it felt like all the promo was last minute. Even after hearing neil gaiman wrote a book originally, i still wasnt convinced to see it.

However, im still waiting to see bourne, the ending of the 2nd one was hype enough for me to see the 3rd.

Brian Boru
08-12-2007, 04:21 PM
i enjoyed it also, and no, not related to either.



Wow. That's really, um... surprising.

It's officially the worst-reviewed film of the summer... and that's saying a mouthful. Not only that, but it's on track to NOT even make its money back. Cool.

Glad you like it. Rush Hour 4 should be ready for your delectation by 2013.

bartleby
08-12-2007, 04:23 PM
It's officially the worst-reviewed film of the summer... and that's saying a mouthful.

A mouthful of untruth.

Brian Boru
08-12-2007, 04:28 PM
A mouthful of untruth.

[God, how I hate to do this...]

ROTTEN TOMATOMETER=

20%

"It's hard to think of a sadder commentary about Hollywood's sequel fetish than the existence of Rush Hour 3."

"The scripting is terrible, the direction lacks energy and the fights -- this movie's entire reason for being -- are filmed in Jumblevison."

"Director Brett Ratner, screenwriter Jeff Nathanson and stars Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker appear to be trying to save the planet one gag at a time by recycling as much material as humanly possible."

Gee. After Ratner did such an amzing job on X3, I'm really surprised to see him totally fuck up a franchise/

bartleby
08-12-2007, 04:30 PM
[God, how I hate to do this...]

ROTTEN TOMATOMETER=

20%


And there were two other movies released just this very same weekend with Tomatometer ratings of 6% and 2%.

JoeE
08-12-2007, 04:33 PM
Daddy Day Camp is reviewed worse than Rush Hour 3.

xyzzy
08-12-2007, 04:36 PM
Stardust actually has pretty good reviews. I'm mildly interested in seeing it.

Brian Boru
08-12-2007, 04:44 PM
And there were two other movies released just this very same weekend with Tomatometer ratings of 6% and 2%.

Um, I thought you knew we were sorta talking about big-budget summer blockbusters, and not potboilers like Brats, Daddy Day Camp and... Hot Rod. You could release that shit straight to DVD and no one would ever know the difference.

Brian Boru
08-12-2007, 04:45 PM
Stardust actually has pretty good reviews. I'm mildly interested in seeing it.

Better hurry. The flies are swarming already.

Thommy Melanson
08-12-2007, 04:47 PM
I'm surprised Paramount even greenlit STARDUST in the first place... although I really shouldn't be.

The suits probably thought "Comic Book Movie!" and got $ $ 's for eyes.

bartleby
08-12-2007, 04:48 PM
Um, I thought you knew we were sorta talking about big-budget summer blockbusters, and not potboilers like Brats, Daddy Day Camp and... Hot Rod.

I don't know why I (or anyone else) would have known that's what you were talking about as it was never mentioned explicitly or even hinted at.

xyzzy
08-12-2007, 04:51 PM
Better hurry. The flies are swarming already.

If it does that badly, I'll just get it from netflix in a few months.

Brian Boru
08-12-2007, 04:53 PM
I don't know why I (or anyone else) would have known that's what you were talking about as it was never mentioned explicitly or even hinted at.

Well, now that we've straightened THAT out...

Would you have seen Daddy Day Camp had it been well-received by critics? Hot Rod? Bratz? Hmmm. Didn't think so.

Whereas these god-awful reviews for Rush Hour will assure a drop of more than 60% next weekend. Count on it.

bartleby
08-12-2007, 04:57 PM
Would you have seen Daddy Day Camp had it been well-received by critics? Hot Rod? Bratz? Hmmm. Didn't think so.

I've already seen 34 movies in the theatre this year (probably about 10-15 more if you count all the 2006 releases that didn't go wide until this year), so yeah, I'd probably see something if it got across-the-board good reviews.

Hell, I was going to see HOT ROD in spite of the critics, but never got around to it. And it this point, it's already pretty much too late.

Brian Boru
08-12-2007, 05:03 PM
Hell, I was going to see HOT ROD in spite of the critics, but never got around to it. And it this point, it's already pretty much too late.

Yeah, I'm in the same boat. I make a short list of the must-sees (like Bourne, Transformers, etc) and if the reviews for something are really good (eg. Ocean's 13), then I'll go see it. Soon as I read the NYT review on Friday AM, I changed my mind about Rush Hour... which you know you're going to watch on DVD some day anyway, so no big whoop. The only film I saw in spite of bad reviews was FF2... which I enjoyed anyway. So you never know.

moonspider
08-12-2007, 05:27 PM
c'mon...who could'nt have guessed that stardust was'nt gonna make that much to begin with....seriously, they hardly promoted it well, nor it seemed they knew how to

Brian Boru
08-12-2007, 05:33 PM
c'mon...who could'nt have guessed that stardust was'nt gonna make that much to begin with....seriously, they hardly promoted it well, nor it seemed they knew how to

It might've helped if they'd made a coherent movie in the first place. Even the film's admirers admitted it was a bit of a mess. (This does not bode well for Thor, I'm afraid... or at least Vaughan's participation.

silverboy
08-12-2007, 06:28 PM
50 mil in August doesn't sound horrible, but that budget's way too high.

bartleby
08-12-2007, 06:32 PM
50 mil in August doesn't sound horrible, but that budget's way too high.

The problem isn't so much the budget as it is all the back-end deals that have New Line giving away 40% of the gross.

Dreg
08-12-2007, 07:11 PM
Paramont had a winner with Stardust. Unfortunately, Stardust had a loser in Paramont.

InBendiswetrust
08-12-2007, 07:11 PM
You know I think it's funny how comcast has stated the headline of this weekend as "New Deniro movie bombs." Since when the fuck is this a deniro movie? he's in it but that's like saying shark tale is a deniro movie. this is a graphic novel movie above all. I don't see why he's on the spot like that.

bartleby
08-13-2007, 03:23 AM
this is a graphic novel movie above all.

I think it's more a fantasy genre movie above all...