PDA

View Full Version : NY Police Report Bomb to Frame Activist as Terrorist



changingshades
04-28-2007, 01:23 PM
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/270407_false_bomb_threat.html
wow, just wow
Two persons identifying themselves as New York police officers interrupted a 9/11 Truth demonstration-- on a public sidewalk in front of the new WTC 7 Building-- to intimidate free speech, stating "Larry [Silverstein] doesn't want to hear it," before accusing We Are Change founder Luke Rudkowski of having a bomb and that his cell phone was "a gun."

The officer was apparently responding to refusals to stop filming their faces as police attempted to impede free speech on behalf of Larry Silverstein-- making slanderous and knowingly false accusations:

"I think he's got a bomb in his bag. Saw wires coming out. Think he's got a bomb in there."

The police officer carried on during the encounter, saying "A terrorist act-- I guess they go away for about 30 days."

Rudkowski tell him he is not a terrorist and that he is an American citizen. The officer responds, "You're right. But by the time the government figures it out, you'll be in the hole for 30 days."



The officer made the statements on camera with a notable smirk, and made no attempt to distance himself or other witnesses from any physical danger (as he would have done he actually believed the activist had a bomb). The officer went on to give away his criminal behavior-- still on tape, despite ongoing demands he and the other officer made that the cameras be shut off.

Alex Jones commented, "We have New York police ON TAPE threatening to frame someone for terrorism in a nonchalant fashion. How bad would it have gotten if there were no cameras around? If they'll talk like this ON CAMERA, heaven help us."

People are arrested every day for joking about bombs or making other bomb references, even if it is clearly not meant to be serious.


This man identified himself as a police officer and accused Rudkowski of 'having a bomb' and 'being a terrorist' to silence his free speech for Larry Silverstein. It is a serious federal and state crime to publicly state that someone has a bomb and is a terrorist when not true-- like extreme example of yelling fire in a theatre-- and needs to be prosecuted.

Such knowingly misleading and false information is not only malicious and immoral, but has been made specifically illegal under the Anti-Hoax Terrorism Act of 2003-- and expanded for more stringency in 2004 and the Terrorism Prevention Act of 2006, not to mention long-standing protections against defamation and public endangerment. There are also many state and local laws prohibiting such activity.


This man who identified himself as a police officer insisted that Rudkowski and other members of WeAreChange.org must cease videotaping him.

Based on this video evidence alone, this officer should receive a prison sentence and would be liable for civil damages as well-- not only to the wronged demonstrator, but by law enforcement for a dangerous waste of resources, as cited by Ted Kennedy's commentary regarding expansion:

"In addition, this measure expands civil liability to allow federal and state governments to seek reimbursement from someone who knows that emergency personnel are responding to a hoax and fails to inform authorities that no such event has occurred."

Rudkowski was not only intimidated by the corrupt and criminal officer, but his camera was confiscated. Shortly afterwards, police also confiscated his cell phone, claiming that it was "a gun," according to Rudkowski.

The detective also snickered and "sang"tauntingly at Rudkowski, "Guess who's going to jail? Guess who's going to jail?"

Luke was not arrested, but was detained for over an hour while police deliberated over whether take further action.

The Face of IntimidationThe Face of Ridicule
This officer makes equal attempts to intimidate and ridicule Rudkowski.

Luke Rudkowski told the perpetrating policeman that his statements were "slanderous," denying ridiculous accusations that he was a terrorist.

The officer again responded, "I saw wires. You look like a terrorist. I don't know what a terrorist looks like. You may be a terrorist for all I know...You've made threats; now I'm concerned."

It is obvious from the recorded video that the demonstration was peaceful, no laws were broken and no threats were made. It is also clear that the reason he approached the group did not regard suspicion of threatening behavior, but to tell them that "Larry didn't want to hear it."

The levels of betrayal against the First Amendment of the Constitution are so absurd and violate the basic tenants of original intent, they can only be compared with gross violations by the enforcement officers of the police state apparent, such as that with Abby Newman (as seen below, from 9/11: The Road to Tyranny). Egregious misinterpretation and abuse perpetrated by the very members of society supposedly in place to guarantee our freedoms.



Abby Newman was arrested for not showing ID in August 2000 and fell victim to an illegal vehicle search in which police found items of subversive literature, including a "pocket Constitution."

One officer asked the other "Is this legal?" (Case in point, where the very society of freedom is violated by the system that regulates that society.)

But that has become all too common in the police state. A Christian group in Philadelphia was arrested in 2004 and charged with counts of criminal conspiracy, ethnic intimidation and riot for "praying, singing and reading scripture during an annual 'gay pride' event. Of course, the question here is not one of Christianity vs. homosexuality, but the criminal prosecution of free speech. The eroding inherent right threatens the freedom of Christians, homosexuals, pink-and-polka dotted people, and other groups who were previously guaranteed protection of their voices-- whether right or wrong, embarrassing, hateful or supportive, blasphemous, sinful or true.

An attorney in Portland, Oregon was falsely arrested under anti-terrorism laws shortly after the 2004 Madrid bombings.

Even in Canada, where limitations such as "reasonable" are pitted against guarantees of free speech, people are granted 'fundamental freedoms' to "thought, belief, opinion and expression."

Yet a protestor demonstrating outside the 2006 Bilderberg conference in Ottawa, Don McCormick was kidnapped by an "Integrated National Security Enforcement Team" who detained him, kicked him and psychologically tortured him-- including threats that they would "cut off his arms."-- all this after being warned not to return to the protest the previous day.

Though McCormick was accused of "trying to blow up the Brookstreet Hotel"-- just as Rudkowski was accused of being a terrorist with a bomb-- he was guilty only of holding a picket sign and being critical of the secretive and manipulative group.

Just as McCormick's free speech was violated, intimidated and labeled as terroristic at the behest and for the benefit of the Bilderberg group, Rudkowski's speech was threatened on behalf of Larry Silverstein-- who apparently wanted to silence discuss of 9/11 and WTC Building 7 through bullying threats.

This is not Rudkowski's first encounter with harassment, intimidation and denials to the rights of free speech. During a speech by Zbigniew Brzezinski, security denied his free speech rights as a member of the press and attempted to confiscate his video tape, despite the fact that he declared his press position. Rudkowski serves as a free lance reporter for GCN Live! Radio (nationally-syndicated), and websites such as Infowars.com and PrisonPlanet.com, among others.

Recently the We Are Change group, which Rudkowski founded and remains involved in, was harassed by police outside ABC Studios during a peaceful demonstration of support for Rosie's public assertion of 9/11 Truth.

Free speech is no longer guaranteed under the de facto shadow government that has hijacked the formerly legitimate government of this once great nation. In fact, the threats are widespread-- all the more so on the front lines 'who dare call it treason.'

Luke Rudkowski can be contacted through WeAreChange.org. He has put out a call for legal defense-- Contact luke if you can provide legal aid or identify any of the officers in this video. Stand up to tyranny and criminal violations of basic, inherent rights.

Aaron Dykes can be contacted at aaron@infowars.com

Get TERRORSTORM Before the History of Government-Sponsored Terrorism Catches Up With You.

Smokinblues
04-28-2007, 01:25 PM
the jones report isn't exactly a very reputable source. you can't trust news about conspiracy whackos from conspiracy whackos.

Ray G.
04-28-2007, 01:25 PM
God damnit, don't those fucking thugs know they're just helping the "truthers" claim that they're being persecuted? I hope the NYPD runs them out of town on a rail if guilty. :frustrat:

changingshades
04-28-2007, 01:27 PM
the jones report isn't exactly a very reputable source. you can't trust news about conspiracy whackos from conspiracy whackos.

it's more the video that I trust, but yeah.

JoeE
04-28-2007, 01:38 PM
I'm having a lot of trouble turning my outrage button on here, given the extent to which Alex Jones and his ilk have participated in the willful spread of disinformation and outright lies to the public that would probably be illegal in countries with less liberal laws on defamation.

Legally the officers are probably in the wrong (no jury in the world will convict them, though). Morally they are absolutely in the right - Alex Jones should perhaps consider how it feels to have people spread outright lies about you to the public the next time he makes one of his sick little documentaries.

Greenville 90210
04-28-2007, 01:38 PM
the jones report isn't exactly a very reputable source. you can't trust news about conspiracy whackos from conspiracy whackos.

Yeah. He made a fake video...

:roll:

RebootedCorpse
04-28-2007, 01:46 PM
Holy shit.
Any real American should be outraged.

WinterRose
04-28-2007, 01:47 PM
I'm not sure I get this. Yeah, Alex Jones may do a bit more harm than good with how he comes across. That said, how does his tinfoil hat brigade attitude justify dismissing him entirely when they have videotaped evidence of this officer going all Gestapo on the protester, ready to frame and put his ass in federal prison for exercising the very First of his guaranteed civil rights?

I don't get the logic. How does discrediting the disseminator of documented and proven evidence make that evidence less true? The intent behind said dissemination can be suspect as you like. Does the fact that one of Alex Jones' people wrote the article make it okay that the officer did what he did? Did it make the incident not happen cos someone with a tin-foil hat attitude mentioned it? WTF?

changingshades
04-28-2007, 01:49 PM
I'm having a lot of trouble turning my outrage button on here, given the extent to which Alex Jones and his ilk have participated in the willful spread of disinformation and outright lies to the public that would probably be illegal in countries with less liberal laws on defamation.

Legally the officers are probably in the wrong (no jury in the world will convict them, though). Morally they are absolutely in the right - Alex Jones should perhaps consider how it feels to have people spread outright lies about you to the public the next time he makes one of his sick little documentaries.

Joe, you think it's morally okay to have police falsify reports in order to have you thrown in jail for a month in order to keep you silent?

JoeE
04-28-2007, 01:51 PM
Joe, you think it's morally okay to have police falsify reports in order to have you thrown in jail for a month in order to keep you silent?

Legally it's unacceptable. Morally I have no problem with it, because Alex Jones would do it to them if he had the chance, and turnabout is fair play.

RebootedCorpse
04-28-2007, 01:52 PM
Legally it's unacceptable. Morally I have no problem with it, because Alex Jones would do it to them if he had the chance, and turnabout is fair play.

You really are a man out of time. 1930s Italy would have loved you.

JoeE
04-28-2007, 01:54 PM
You really are a man out of time. 1930s Italy would have loved you.

Boo-hoo. I said I thought it was legally unacceptable. I just don't have any shame reveling in the pain, misfortune, and unfair treatment of bad people.

Greenville 90210
04-28-2007, 02:28 PM
Legally it's unacceptable. Morally I have no problem with it, because Alex Jones would do it to them if he had the chance, and turnabout is fair play.

How do you know he'd do that?

I'm not the biggest Alex Jones supporter but he's against that kind of stuff.

Greenville 90210
04-28-2007, 02:31 PM
Boo-hoo. I said I thought it was legally unacceptable. I just don't have any shame reveling in the pain, misfortune, and unfair treatment of bad people.

"Bad people"? You sound like a biased six year old.

I don't think America is the country for you.

Jamie Coville
04-28-2007, 03:00 PM
Is this video online somewhere? I'd like to see it.

Magnum V.I.
04-28-2007, 03:01 PM
Is this video online somewhere? I'd like to see it.

click the link. It's in the article.

artimoff
04-28-2007, 03:11 PM
That man (the "cop") could be anybody. I'm guessing it's an actor or a private security guard.

manbearpig
04-28-2007, 03:11 PM
That's ridiculous.

Magnum V.I.
04-28-2007, 03:26 PM
http://www.jonesreport.com/images/270407_officer_terrorist.jpg
http://www.jonesreport.com/images/270407_officer_no_film.jpg
http://www.jonesreport.com/images/270407_face_of_intimidation.jpg

I might be mistaken...but these "officers" don't have any badges and could be any fucking guy on the street who hated these people....

JoeE
04-28-2007, 03:27 PM
http://www.jonesreport.com/images/270407_officer_terrorist.jpg
http://www.jonesreport.com/images/270407_officer_no_film.jpg
http://www.jonesreport.com/images/270407_face_of_intimidation.jpg

I might be mistaken...but these "officers" don't have any badges and could be any fucking guy on the street who hated these people....

Which would still be a crime - you're not allowed to impersonate police officers.

Magnum V.I.
04-28-2007, 03:31 PM
Which would still be a crime - you're not allowed to impersonate police officers.

I know. But Until I see them with there badges showing this just sounds like fuel to the shadow government conspiracy.

JoeE
04-28-2007, 03:51 PM
MAN that was a painful 10 minutes. I like how seven minutes in they had a COMPLETELY UNRELATED shot of a helicopter, because I guess there's no better way to invoke conspiracies than to show footage of a helicopter.

Foolish Mortal
04-28-2007, 04:33 PM
The "Truth" people are a bunch of kooks, but that didn't give the police the authority to harass them.